<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Field report from GNUnify 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog/2008/02/10/field-report-from-gnunify-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog/2008/02/10/field-report-from-gnunify-2008/</link>
	<description>A collection of jottings on various issues that excite no one else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Random thoughts and serendipity &#187; Notes collation &#8230; again</title>
		<link>http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog/2008/02/10/field-report-from-gnunify-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-49037</link>
		<dc:creator>Random thoughts and serendipity &#187; Notes collation &#8230; again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog/2008/02/10/field-report-from-gnunify-2008/#comment-49037</guid>
		<description>[...] The post from Jono surprisingly echoes the thoughts crossing my mind when I was sitting through Alolita&#8217;s talk at GNUnify2008. Two things are annoying - [1] too deep and mechanical analysis of successful communities in order to learn the process or methods that make these communities successful and [2] not putting enough emphasis on the &#8220;social bonds&#8221; that glue the community together. For all the bling and fancy stuff, a community grows organically because of friendly out-going people who swap ideas, share stories. Friendship won&#8217;t really replace good community practice, but just methods and tools won&#8217;t create a community - either of creation or of consumption. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The post from Jono surprisingly echoes the thoughts crossing my mind when I was sitting through Alolita&#8217;s talk at GNUnify2008. Two things are annoying &#8211; [1] too deep and mechanical analysis of successful communities in order to learn the process or methods that make these communities successful and [2] not putting enough emphasis on the &#8220;social bonds&#8221; that glue the community together. For all the bling and fancy stuff, a community grows organically because of friendly out-going people who swap ideas, share stories. Friendship won&#8217;t really replace good community practice, but just methods and tools won&#8217;t create a community &#8211; either of creation or of consumption. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
